Trademark · Application 909079
STOREXE
AbandonedOwner
Saved copy · last checked just now
STOREXE is a word trademark application, number 909079, in class 30 (tea, spices, bakery, snacks), filed on 10 Mar 2000. Its status on the Indian trademark register is “Abandoned”, last checked 13 Nov 2026.
Filed10 Mar 2000
TypeWord
Owner's stateMaharashtra
Registry officeMumbai
Use claimed01/02/2000
Goods & services
[CLASS : 30] COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA SAGO, COFFEE SUBSTITUTES, FLOUR AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREALS, BREAD, BISCUITS, CAKES, PASTRY AND CONFECTIONERY, ICES, HONEY, TREACLE, YEAST, BANKING POWDER, SALT, MUSTARD, ETC
What is due
Abandoned, refused, withdrawn or removed
Search + file₹1,299 + govt fee
Ask an expert on WhatsAppPay only after a free consultation.Full record · free with an account
The next deadline, documents on file, similar marks and the owner's other marks.
No payment · No spam calls · Number never sold
What this status means
This application or registration is no longer pending or protected.
More about “Not active”Documents on file
Quick answers
- What is the status of the STOREXE trademark?
- Abandoned, as of 13 Nov 2026. This application or registration is no longer pending or protected.
- Which class is the STOREXE trademark in?
- Class 30, Tea, spices, bakery, snacks: Tea, coffee and cocoa, rice, flour and cereal products, bakery and confectionery, sweets, chocolate, ice cream, sugar and honey, salt, spices and masalas, sauces.
What to do about “Not active”: yourself, or with an expert
The government fee is the same either way. Here is exactly what the portal asks for, and what an expert would do differently.
Do it yourself · ipindiaonline.gov.in
File again, or seek review / appeal if there is still time
You need
- Class 3 DSC of the applicant (or authorised signatory) and your portal login.
- The order or status history showing why the application ended (abandoned, refused, withdrawn).
On the portal
- Find the reason in the documents: missed reply, refusal after hearing, withdrawal or removal for non-renewal.
- If a decision was wrong or a deadline was missed for a good reason, file TM-M for review within a month; a refusal after hearing can be appealed to the High Court within three months.
- Otherwise, run a new search (the cited marks may still be there) and file a fresh TM-A, possibly with a changed mark or class.
Where people slip
- Filing the same mark again without fixing what caused the refusal.
- Missing the short review and appeal windows.
Or let an expert handle it · Invorn
Search + file
₹1,299+ govt fee
- Reads the order, tells you whether review, appeal or a fresh filing is the better path, and prepares it.
Free consultation first. Pay only after it, and if you are not happy before anything is filed, the fee is refunded. Filed by a Registered Trade Marks Agent.
Should you file yourself or use an expert?Six honest differences, and when DIY is fine
YourselfWith an expert
Search and the go/no-go callYourself: The free search here finds spelling and sound-alikes. Logos, related classes and prefixes/suffixes need a manual look, and the call on 'file or change the name' is yours.Expert: Checks devices and related classes too, and tells you before you pay the fee whether to file, tweak the name, or pick another class. A refused filing costs the full government fee.
Class and the goods/services wordingYourself: The description cannot be widened after filing. Too narrow leaves gaps; too broad invites objections and oppositions. Wrong class means filing again and paying again.Expert: Writes the specification to cover what you sell now and will sell, in the classes that matter, in the wording examiners accept.
Fee category and proofYourself: Filing as a startup or MSME without the certificate draws a deficit-fee notice and delays examination.Expert: Gets the Udyam or startup proof in order first so the ₹4,500 fee holds.
Examination report (about 4 in 10 applications get one)Yourself: The reply is a legal argument: why the mark is distinctive (Section 9) or not confusingly similar to the marks cited (Section 11), with evidence and case references. 30 days, no extension to count on. A weak reply leads to a hearing or refusal.Expert: Drafts the reply to each objection with precedent and your evidence of use; knows when a consent letter or a small change saves the application.
Hearings and oppositionsYourself: Hearings are argued live (video). Oppositions run through pleadings and two evidence rounds with 2-month deadlines; one missed step and the application is abandoned.Expert: Appears for you, files on time, and advises whether to fight, settle or withdraw before more money goes in.
Deadlines over the 12 to 24 monthsYourself: You watch the status yourself: reply in 30 days, opposition window 4 months, counter-statement 2 months, renewal every 10 years. Most dead applications died of a missed date, not a bad mark.Expert: Tracks every date and tells you only when something needs a decision.
Doing it yourself is reasonable when
- It is a plain word mark (no logo) in one class.
- The search shows no identical or sound-alike live mark in that class.
- You have, or will get, a Class 3 DSC and are comfortable with online forms.
- You can describe your goods or services precisely and will check the status every month for a year or two.
What it costs either way
- Government fee: the same whoever files (₹4,500 or ₹9,000 per class).
- Yourself: plus a DSC (about ₹1,000 to ₹1,500) and your time.
- With Invorn: a professional fee on top of the government fee, shown on the fee table. Free consultation first; if you are not happy before the application is submitted, the fee is refunded.
Invorn: search + filing from ₹1,299 + govt fee · objection reply ₹1,949 (no govt fee). Full fee table.
Ask which path fits your caseThinking of a name like this? Check it before you print the packaging.
- Filed by a Registered Trade Marks Agent
- 7-day refund policy
- No spam, numbers never sold
- Register checked on 1 Aug, 06:55 pm IST
Last checked against the register on 1 Aug, 06:55 pm IST. Owner addresses are not published. About this data