TrademarkVista
WhatsApp
Trademark · Application 6783452

SANSA BY THE WOODS

ObjectedOwner
Saved copy · last checked 4 months ago

SANSA BY THE WOODS is a word trademark application, number 6783452, in class 43 (restaurants & hotels), filed on 1 Jan 2025. Its status on the Indian trademark register is “Objected”, last checked 3 Aug 2026.

Class43 — Restaurants & hotels
Filed1 Jan 2025
TypeWord
Owner's stateDelhi
Registry office—
Use claimedProposed to be used
Goods & services

[CLASS : 43] Food and Drink preparation services; contract food services; takeaway food services; Food preparation for others on an outsourcing basis; Accommodation (Rental of temporary); Accommodation reservation(temporary) Cafes; Cafeterias; Camp services (Holiday){Lodging}; Campground facilities (Providing); Canteens; Catering (food and drinks); Day - nurseries (crèches); Holiday camp services {Lodging}; Homes (Retirement); Homes (Tourist); Hotel reservations; Houses (Boarding); Motels; Rental of meeting rooms; Rental of temporary accommodations; Restaurants; Restaurants (self services); Snack-bars; Tourist homes, Rental of Temporary accommodation in holiday homes and flats, rental of rooms as temporary living accommodations; serving food and drink in restaurants and bar; hotel concierge services; providing food and drink in internet cafes; serving food and drink in internet cafes; providing information about temporary accommodation via the internet; resort hotels; catering services specialised in cutting ham for fairs, tasting and public events; cookery advice all being covered under class 43.

What is due
Objected — awaiting reply to examination report
Objection reply₹1,949 + govt fee
Follow it free: an email when the status changes, a hearing is listed, a document is added, or it's advertised (with the last date to oppose).
Ask an expert on WhatsAppPay only after a free consultation.
Full record · free with an account
The next deadline, documents on file, similar marks and the owner's other marks.
No payment · No spam calls · Number never sold

What this status means

The examiner has raised objections in an examination report (for example, similarity to an earlier mark or a descriptive name). A written reply is needed.

More about “Objected”

Documents on file

Quick answers

What is the status of the SANSA BY THE WOODS trademark?
Objected, as of 3 Aug 2026. The examiner has raised objections in an examination report (for example, similarity to an earlier mark or a descriptive name). A written reply is needed.
Which class is the SANSA BY THE WOODS trademark in?
Class 43, Restaurants & hotels: Providing food and drink (restaurants, cafés, cloud kitchens, catering) and temporary accommodation (hotels, hostels, guest houses).

What to do about “Objected”: yourself, or with an expert

The government fee is the same either way. Here is exactly what the portal asks for, and what an expert would do differently.

Do it yourself · ipindiaonline.gov.in
File the reply to the examination report
Govt fee No government feeDeadline Within 30 days of receiving the examination report. The 2017 Rules give no extension; don't count on one.
You need
  • Class 3 DSC of the applicant (or authorised signatory) and your portal login.
  • The examination report (download it from the application's documents on the portal).
  • Evidence if you already use the mark: dated invoices, packaging, website or ad screenshots, sales figures; a user affidavit on stamp paper if you claim use.
  • If marks were cited under Section 11: their details from the register, so you can argue the differences.
On the portal
  1. Log in to the e-filing portal with the DSC token connected.
  2. Open Comprehensive e-Filing → Reply to Examination Report (or 'Response to ER'), select your application number.
  3. Write a reply that answers every objection in the report one by one: for Section 9 (descriptive / not distinctive) explain and prove distinctiveness; for Section 11 (similar earlier marks) compare the marks, goods and trade channels and explain why confusion is unlikely.
  4. Attach the reply as a PDF with annexures (evidence, affidavit, any consent letter), sign with the DSC and submit. Keep the acknowledgement.
Where people slip
  • A one-paragraph 'we disagree' reply almost always ends in a hearing.
  • Replying only to some objections: the unanswered ones stand.
  • Claiming use without an affidavit and proof.
  • Missing the 30 days: the application is treated as abandoned.
Or let an expert handle it · Invorn
Objection reply
₹1,949
  • Reads the cited marks and the examiner's grounds, then drafts a point-by-point reply with case law and your evidence.
  • Advises when a consent letter, a disclaimer or a small amendment will clear the objection faster than arguing.
  • Files before the deadline and watches for the hearing notice.
Free consultation first. Pay only after it, and if you are not happy before anything is filed, the fee is refunded. Filed by a Registered Trade Marks Agent.
Should you file yourself or use an expert?Six honest differences, and when DIY is fine
YourselfWith an expert
Search and the go/no-go callYourself: The free search here finds spelling and sound-alikes. Logos, related classes and prefixes/suffixes need a manual look, and the call on 'file or change the name' is yours.Expert: Checks devices and related classes too, and tells you before you pay the fee whether to file, tweak the name, or pick another class. A refused filing costs the full government fee.
Class and the goods/services wordingYourself: The description cannot be widened after filing. Too narrow leaves gaps; too broad invites objections and oppositions. Wrong class means filing again and paying again.Expert: Writes the specification to cover what you sell now and will sell, in the classes that matter, in the wording examiners accept.
Fee category and proofYourself: Filing as a startup or MSME without the certificate draws a deficit-fee notice and delays examination.Expert: Gets the Udyam or startup proof in order first so the ₹4,500 fee holds.
Examination report (about 4 in 10 applications get one)Yourself: The reply is a legal argument: why the mark is distinctive (Section 9) or not confusingly similar to the marks cited (Section 11), with evidence and case references. 30 days, no extension to count on. A weak reply leads to a hearing or refusal.Expert: Drafts the reply to each objection with precedent and your evidence of use; knows when a consent letter or a small change saves the application.
Hearings and oppositionsYourself: Hearings are argued live (video). Oppositions run through pleadings and two evidence rounds with 2-month deadlines; one missed step and the application is abandoned.Expert: Appears for you, files on time, and advises whether to fight, settle or withdraw before more money goes in.
Deadlines over the 12 to 24 monthsYourself: You watch the status yourself: reply in 30 days, opposition window 4 months, counter-statement 2 months, renewal every 10 years. Most dead applications died of a missed date, not a bad mark.Expert: Tracks every date and tells you only when something needs a decision.
Doing it yourself is reasonable when
  • It is a plain word mark (no logo) in one class.
  • The search shows no identical or sound-alike live mark in that class.
  • You have, or will get, a Class 3 DSC and are comfortable with online forms.
  • You can describe your goods or services precisely and will check the status every month for a year or two.
What it costs either way
  • Government fee: the same whoever files (₹4,500 or ₹9,000 per class).
  • Yourself: plus a DSC (about ₹1,000 to ₹1,500) and your time.
  • With Invorn: a professional fee on top of the government fee, shown on the fee table. Free consultation first; if you are not happy before the application is submitted, the fee is refunded.

Invorn: search + filing from ₹1,299 + govt fee · objection reply ₹1,949 (no govt fee). Full fee table.

Ask which path fits your case
Thinking of a name like this? Check it before you print the packaging.
Free verdict in seconds, by spelling and by sound.
Check a brand name

Last checked against the register on 3 Aug, 05:30 am IST. Owner addresses are not published. About this data